Knowledge and the opportunity to
obtain new information at lightening speeds is what drives our workforce, sets
us apart from our competition, and propels us forward to continue growing and
improving. The text states that information can be transformed into knowledge
by a firm expending additional resources to discover patterns, rules, and
contexts where knowledge works. However, wisdom is considered the application
of knowledge to solve problems (Laudon 417). There are two types of knowledge;
tacit knowledge is knowledge that has not been documented and most likely
resides in a person’s head. The second type is explicit knowledge and this type
has been documented. Knowledge is really broad and somewhat abstract in its
definition. Knowledge can be stored in documents, e-mails, libraries, etc. It
can exist in various business processes however it is not easily moved or universally
applicable.
As previously stated, knowledge can
give the competitive edge to one company over another because perhaps one
company’s processes, production, and use of resources saves time, money, and
supplies. While the other company will fail due to the lack of knowledge and
will continue wasting time, money, and resources. At Chesapeake Energy, we
engineered and pioneered horizontal drilling, which is a new technology that
enabled our company to become the second leading company in the U.S. for
drilling natural gas. This knowledge propelled us forward and gave us the upper
hand.
With all of the tacit and explicit
knowledge within a firm, there needs to be some way to manage it. “Knowledge
management refers to the set of business processes developed in an organization
to create, store, transfer, and apply knowledge” (Laudon 419). As with any
information system, we need to decide how we will acquire the data, store the
data, and ultimately disseminate and apply the data. The same goes for
knowledge management systems.
There are two types of knowledge
management systems, the first being the enterprise-wide knowledge management
system. These systems are more broad and collect information from all parts of
the company. They typically include data searches and support other
technologies such as search engines and e-mail. In my opinion, an example of an
enterprise-wide knowledge management system could be a company intranet or
internal training system. The second type of system is a knowledge work system
(KWS). These types of knowledge systems are built for a specific purpose or an expert
group such as engineers, scientists, etc. The experts are responsible for
creating and discovering new knowledge for the firm and therefore need more
complex and dedicated systems.
In conclusion, knowledge management
systems are necessary to collect and disperse knowledge within a company.
Knowledge is power.
Source: Laudon, Kenneth C. &
Jane P. Laudon. Management Information
Systems: Managing the Digital Firm 12th ed. Pearson Hall, 2010.
No comments:
Post a Comment